An analysis of michael leunig

The film Separate An analysis of michael leunig Equal also accurately articulated our plight as a species through the dialogue of one character: Shortly, however, when the human condition is explained, it will become apparent why we have always had to maintain a positive, brave front—for deep within the human make-up, there is an intuitive belief that one day we would be able to find the liberating, redeeming and totally TRANSFORMING understanding of ourselves and although the situation became more and more desperate each day, we have always had to cling onto that hope, keep believing in a positive outcome for the human race.

He has people strangling each other, suiciding and walking around in a mad state—reflecting, in effect, every aspect of the human condition. Improved forms of management such as better laws, better politics and better economics—and better self-management, such as new ways of disciplining, organising, motivating or even transcending our troubled natures—have all failed to end the march towards ever greater levels of devastation and unhappiness.

We will have a consilience or An analysis of michael leunig of all knowledge. I should also say that not only is the human condition the most difficult of subjects for humans to think about and look at because it involves self-confrontation, it is also a difficult subject for humans to engage in because it is the area of enquiry where religion and science, faith and reason finally overlap.

Its bond rate is barely above junk…The media portray California as a noir fantasyland of over-crowded schools, perpetual droughts, celebrity breakdowns, illegal immigration, hellish congestion and general malaise.

Clearly only a change at the fundamental level of human behaviour can redeem the situation, save us from the prospect of terminal destruction.

The cures must come from this same source; which means the planet needs psychological maturity…fast. Despite all our marvellous accomplishments, we humans have been the most ferocious and destructive force the world has ever known.

The overall point to be made here is that we humans have an unspeakable history of greed, hatred, brutality, rape, torture, persecution, murder and war—a propensity for deeds of shocking violence, depravity, indifference and cruelty. So with this cartoon Leunig broke all the rules.

This is not a picture of a lovely ordered city park where people peacefully and happily enjoy themselves, as we all too easily prefer to delude ourselves that the world we have created is like.

So instead of lots of different subjects, all information will be integrated under one subject: The Fifth Proposition is that this information will make sense of and reconcile all the opposites in the human situation.

The fact of the matter is we have lived in near total denial of not just the issue of the human condition, but any thoughts that even remotely brought it into focus. The Fourth Proposition is that in the future all schooling will begin with the basic presentation that is going to be given today—and all classes and grades thereafter will simply keep fleshing out the concept, as we will also begin to do today.

While the article goes on to paint a positive picture, its descriptions of an end play situation unfolding in California are closer to the truth. Only the clarifying, dignifying, reconciling and redeeming biological understanding of the dilemma of the human condition could heal the underlying insecurity of that condition and, by so doing, bring an end to all the devastation, distress and suffering in the world.

When our objective, scientific analysis of the mechanisms and workings of our world finally finds the insights that make it possible to explain the human condition, science at that moment enters the subjective domain of the human condition where our spiritual faiths and beliefs have operated—reason and faith are finally reconciled.

Everywhere he looks there is tumultuous congestion: As extraordinary, even outrageous, as this statement sounds, over the next few hours I plan to validate it by establishing the following fabulous propositions—and I want to outline these propositions now because while they may seem bold now, when I come back to them at the end of this presentation you might in fact find you agree with them: There had to be a scientific, first-principle-based, biological reason for our divisive behaviour and finding it had become a matter of great urgency.

We had arrived at a situation where humanity desperately needed clear biological understanding of ourselves, understanding that would make sense of our divisive condition and liberate us from criticism, lift the psychological burden of guilt, give us meaning.

With this cartoon, Leunig has boldly revealed the truth that we humans have been a brutally angry, hateful, destructive, arrogant, egocentric, selfish, mad, lonely, unhappy and psychologically depressed species. I think I like this last quote best of them all, but all express the seriousness of the situation.

Indeed, as the article on California illustrated, we have entered an end play or end game situation on Earth where the planet cannot absorb any further devastation from the effects of our behaviour, nor can the human body for that matter endure any more debilitating stress and alienation.

The First Proposition is that what is to be presented will explain the fundamental paradox of the human condition—explain how we humans could be good, wonderful and worthwhile when all the evidence seems to unequivocally indicate that we are the very opposite of good, wonderful and worthwhile.

All knowledge will be integrated properly. Instead of learning apparently unrelated subjects like mathematics and history and chemistry and spelling, all knowledge will be taught in the context of the human condition; it will be about understanding ourselves and our world, and be presented in a structured, authentic way, beginning with who we humans are.

To bring about the peaceful, integrated, environmentally considerate world we all seek we ultimately had to address and find understanding of our less-than-ideal, divisive competitive, aggressive, selfish nature—because without the reconciling, ameliorating explanation for why we humans have been divisively behaved the underlying insecurity about being divisively behaved would only continue; humans would, in effect, be condemned to a life of perpetual insecurity and thus ever-increasing levels of upset, angry, divisive and destructive behaviour and, consequently, ever-increasing levels of deadening denial or alienation to cope with the horror of that behaviour.

Objectivity and subjectivity, materialism and spiritualism meet when the human condition is addressed and explained, but this collision of two previously very separate domains can cause great anxiety, about which more will be said later.

The Second Proposition is that the seemingly hopeless situation facing the human race is going to suddenly be made entirely hopeful, in fact incredibly exciting.

Involving as it does these difficulties of self-confrontation and the massive religion-and-science-reconciling-paradigm-shift, it should not come as a surprise that the human condition has been the most contentious of subjects—so contentious that some people even believed it was a subject that could never, and should never, be opened up.

We needed to find the reconciling, redeeming understanding of ourselves—and it is precisely that crucial, all-important understanding that is going to be presented.

So while these cartoons and news articles provide some indication of the dire straits the world is in, it is the ability to turn this dire situation into one where all the problems faced by the world are solved through finding redeeming understanding of the human condition as we have always hoped, even at the eleventh hour, that they would be that is the basis of the next proposition.

Sydney Morning Herald, 14 Oct. And, in this drawing Leunig even seems to have predicted a climactic demonstration of all our human excesses and frustrations when, on September 11,terrorists flew planes into the tall, square-shaped towers of the World Trade Center in New York City!

And, in fact, what will be explained in Part 3: What is so brave about this cartoon is that it defies the historical and now deeply habituated practice of denial of the issue of the human condition and instead fully resurrects and confronts us squarely with the issue.based cartoonist, Michael Leunig, is an outstanding artist whose works speak to the nature of current human conditions.

Leunig uses simple imagery accompanied with metaphors to stimulate different reactions in the viewer. Extended analysis of the Michael Leunig cartoon "My Former Self" Essay Leunig deeply values the truth and he questions why people feel that the truth is never good enough.

Nov 11,  · Re: Leunig Cartoon Analysis that leuing cartoon analysis is dreadfully close to the intrepretation of "the lost thing by Sean Tan" ITs the main bit where the unknown monster finds home.

it shows how his life is dull and how his monster finds its home.

he comes to realisations and such. its worth a good read and an awesum. At first I was amused. But now I think whole generations are derailed by watching TV rather than experiencing reality. Gen Y wants to be entertained rather than create entertainment. And I believe TV is the culprit.

It isn't malevolent but it saps creativity because that is done by someone remote. Michael saw it well before me.

Cartoon by Michael Leunig, Melbourne’s The Age newspaper, 8 Oct. This masterpiece by the Australian cartoonist Michael Leunig truthfully depicts all the horrors of the human condition.

What is so brave about this cartoon is that it defies the historical and now deeply habituated practice of denial of the issue of the human condition and. Michael Leunig’s cartoon, The Understandascope,captures the essence of something profound and, in this case, paradoxical.

We see a lone figure, peering through a telescope-like device at a mass of people interacting below.

An analysis of michael leunig
Rated 5/5 based on 48 review